4.7 Article

MagAuth: Secure and Usable Two-Factor Authentication With Magnetic Wrist Wearables

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MOBILE COMPUTING
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 311-327

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TMC.2021.3072598

Keywords

Mobile authentication; security; usability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MagAuth is a dual-factor authentication scheme that utilizes magnetic wrist wearables to enhance the security and usability of password-based authentication on mobile touchscreen devices. Users enroll a self-chosen unlock pattern or touch gesture, performing it with the same hand as the magnetic wrist wearable, to verify their identity.
Secure and usable user authentication is the first line of defense against cyber attacks on smart end-user devices. Advanced hacking techniques pose severe threats to the traditional authentication systems based on the password/PIN/fingerprint. We propose MagAuth, a secure and usable two-factor authentication scheme with commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) wrist wearables with magnetic strap bands to enhance the security and usability of password-based authentication for mobile touchscreen devices. In MagAuth, a user enrolls a self-chosen unlock pattern or touch gesture into his touchscreen device by performing it with the same hand the magnetic wrist wearable is on. The chosen unlock pattern or touch gesture serves as the first authentication factor, and the user's behavioral features manifested in the magnetic field changes during his finger movement correspond to the second factor. The user can unlock his touchscreen device only when both authentication factors can be validated. Comprehensive user experiments confirm the high security and usability of MagAuth. In particular, MagAuth achieves an average true-positive rate up to 96.3 percent and a false-positive rate no larger than 8.4 percent. Moreover, we show that MagAuth is highly resilient to various attacks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available