4.7 Article

One-Dimensional Deep Low-Rank and Sparse Network for Accelerated MRI

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
Volume 42, Issue 1, Pages 79-90

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2022.3203312

Keywords

Deep learning; fast imaging; MRI reconstruction; low-rank; sparse

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a new approach that utilizes 1D convolution to improve the reconstruction quality of magnetic resonance imaging. Experimental results demonstrate that this method has better reconstruction performance in the case of limited training data and exhibits good robustness to different undersampling scenarios and discrepancies between the training and test data.
Deep learning has shown astonishing performance in accelerated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Most state-of-the-art deep learning reconstructions adopt the powerful convolutional neural network and perform 2D convolution since many magnetic resonance images or their corresponding k-space are in 2D. In this work, we present a new approach that explores the 1D convolution, making the deep network much easier to be trained and generalized. We further integrate the 1D convolution into the proposed deep network, named as One-dimensional Deep Low-rank and Sparse network (ODLS), which unrolls the iteration procedure of a low-rank and sparse reconstruction model. Extensive results on in vivo knee and brain datasets demonstrate that, the proposed ODLS is very suitable for the case of limited training subjects and provides improved reconstruction performance than state-of-the-art methods both visually and quantitatively. Additionally, ODLS also shows nice robustness to different undersampling scenarios and some mismatches between the training and test data. In summary, our work demonstrates that the 1D deep learning scheme is memory-efficient and robust in fast MRI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available