4.4 Article

Key Points in the Determination of the Interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya Interaction From Asymmetric Bubble Domain Expansion

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS
Volume 58, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2022.3217891

Keywords

Domain structures; Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI); magneto-optics

Funding

  1. European Metrology Programme for Innovation and Research (EMPIR) Programme [17FUN08-TOPS]
  2. European Union
  3. German Research Foundation [268565370, 403502522-SPP 2137]
  4. Horizon 2020 Framework Program of the European Commission [856538]
  5. DARPA Topological Excitations in Electronics (TEE) Program [R18-687-004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experimental studies using magneto-optics have shown a correlation between domain wall roughness and interface roughness of sample layers, with standard creep hypothesis models unable to accurately reproduce domain wall velocity profiles under high roughness conditions. Comparison with Brillouin light scattering measurements revealed that the latter method often yields higher measured values of Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction.
Different models have been used to evaluate the interfacial Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI) from the asymmetric bubble expansion method using magneto-optics. Here, we investigate the most promising candidates over a range of different magnetic multilayers with perpendicular anisotropy. Models based on the standard creep hypothesis are not able to reproduce the domain wall (DW) velocity profile when the DW roughness is high. Our results demonstrate that the DW roughness and the interface roughness of the sample layers are correlated. Furthermore, we give guidance on how to obtain reliable results for the DMI value with this popular method. A comparison of the results with Brillouin light scattering (BLS) measurements on the same samples shows that the BLS approach often results in higher measured values of DMI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available