4.7 Article

A Train Scheduling for Energy Optimization: Tehran Metro System as a Case Study

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TITS.2022.3215095

Keywords

Energy consumption management; efficiency; energy-saving; train movement schedule; optimization

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the importance of energy efficiency in electrical railway systems and proposes an optimization method through proper train scheduling, which results in a 3.2% energy-saving compared to the existing schedule.
Energy efficiency is one of the main issues in designing and operating different electrical systems. Energy-saving in electrical railway systems is an important concern due to the high amount of used energy. In order to find optimum energy consumption, different methodologies shall be examined. In addition, various affecting factors should be determined, and suitable solutions should be adopted. This paper illustrates that proper train scheduling is one of the effective approaches to optimize the system energy. Accordingly, comprehensive modeling is proposed considering different affecting factors such as the slope of different lines, the speed limits in each section, the time limit between the arrivals of trains to each station, and different modes of operation such as motoring and braking. Using the proposed model, an optimization problem with the objective function of energy-saving is solved. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method, the proposed scheduling scheme is applied to Line 2 of Tehran Urban & Suburban Railway Operation Company. Based on the results, using the proposed scheme causes a 3.2% energy-saving compared to the existing train movement schedule in the same line. The proposed train movement scheduling program is proceeding to the last verification steps and will be used as a part of Tehran Metro navigation system in the near future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available