4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Lower Rhine historical flood magnitudes of the last 450 years reproduced from grain-size measurements of flood deposits using End Member Modelling

Journal

CATENA
Volume 130, Issue -, Pages 69-81

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2014.12.004

Keywords

Rhine; Palaeoflood; End-member modelling; Flood deposits; Grain-size distribution; Abandoned channel

Funding

  1. Deltares BGS
  2. TNO
  3. Utrecht University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The objective of this research was to unlock the potential of fluvial archives to create flood chronologies, based on grain-size characteristics,of flood deposits located in two recently formed fluvio-lacustrine sequences. Methods: Grain-size data was compared with contemporaneous discharge measurements (for the Lower Rhine, The Netherlands). Regression relations between coarse-tail,grain-size parameters and measured discharge were established for the last similar to 240 years, and applied to the older parts of both cores - resulting in peak discharge estimates back to AD similar to 1550. Results: Grain-size descriptive parameters such as the 95th percentile and end-member modelling outcomes correlate well with discharge and turn out to be sensitive proxies for inferring flood magnitudes. Locally, geomorphological changes influence the relation between peak discharge magnitudes and flood bed coarseness, but these can be assessed, using continuous flood layer and background sedimentation measurements to standardize grain-size descriptive parameters. Conclusion/implications: Flood records distilled from sedimentary archives hold great potential for extending existing records of observed discharge and aid establishment of design discharge for flood protection measures and assessment of non-stationarity of the flooding regime due to climatic and anthropogenic forcing. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available