4.7 Article

Asymptotic Nash Equilibrium for the M -Ary Sequential Adversarial Hypothesis Testing Game

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIFS.2022.3231095

Keywords

Testing; Games; Nash equilibrium; Training; Perturbation methods; Markov processes; Machine learning algorithms; Game theory; M-ary sequential hypothesis testing; adversary

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a novel M-ary sequential hypothesis testing problem is formulated as a sequential adversarial hypothesis testing game, played between a decision maker and an adversary. The decision maker aims to minimize the expectation of the stopping time, while the adversary aims to maximize it. Strategies are derived to attain the asymptotic Nash equilibrium of the game. Numerical results validate the theoretical findings.
In this paper, we consider a novel M-ary sequential hypothesis testing problem in which an adversary is present and perturbs the distributions of the samples before the decision maker observes them. This problem is formulated as a sequential adversarial hypothesis testing game played between the decision maker and the adversary. This game is a zero-sum and strategic one. We assume the adversary is active under all hypotheses and knows the underlying distribution of observed samples. We adopt this framework as it is the worst-case scenario from the perspective of the decision maker. The goal of the decision maker is to minimize the expectation of the stopping time to ensure that the test is as efficient as possible; the adversary's goal is, instead, to maximize the stopping time. We derive a pair of strategies under which the asymptotic Nash equilibrium of the game is attained. We also consider the case in which the adversary is not aware of the underlying hypothesis and hence is constrained to apply the same strategy regardless of which hypothesis is in effect. Numerical results corroborate our theoretical findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available