4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Graph Attention Enabled Convolutional Network for Distribution System Probabilistic Power Flow

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRY APPLICATIONS
Volume 58, Issue 6, Pages 7068-7078

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIA.2022.3202159

Keywords

Correlation; graph; node embedding; prob-abilistic power flow (PPF)

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62101473]
  2. Hong Kong Research Grants Council (RGC)General Research Fund (GRF) Project [PolyU15209322]
  3. polyu project [1-YY4T, 1-YY5M]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes a graph attention enabled convolutional network (GAECN) to approximate probabilistic power flow (PPF) and address the state uncertainties in distribution power systems caused by complex correlations among renewable outputs.
Probabilistic power flow (PPF) is pivotal to quantifying the state uncertainties of distribution power systems. However, it is very challenging due to underlying complex correlations among renewable outputs. To address this problem, a graph attention enabled convolutional network (GAECN) is proposed to approximate PPF in this article. Specifically, the graph convolutional layer of GAECN is used to aggregate the correlations among the nodal power injections during the training process. Within this layer, a full self-adaptive graph convolutional operation is proposed to automatically capture and learn the implicit correlation for achieving significantly enhanced accuracy of PPF. This layer is then followed by the convolutional neural network to capture the uncertain generation of renewable energy to achieve the robust computation of system state variable distributions. The simulation results demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of the proposed method in IEEE 33, PG & E 69-node, 118-node, and practical 76-node distribution systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available