4.8 Article

Small Sample Reliability Assessment With Online Time-Series Data Based on a Worm Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network Learning Method

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 1207-1216

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2022.3168667

Keywords

Data augmentation; generative adversarial network (GAN); online evaluation; reliability assessment; small sample; time series analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes a novel autoaugmentation network to address the problem of limited time-series data. The network generates synthetic data that carry realistic patterns and expands a small sample without prior knowledge for reliability evaluation. Experimental results in lithium battery cells demonstrate the breakthrough achieved by this method in online reliability assessment.
The scarcity of time-series data constrains the accuracy of online reliability assessment. Data expansion is the most intuitive way to address this problem. However, conventional small-sample reliability evaluation methods either depend on prior knowledge or are inadequate for time series. This article proposes a novel autoaugmentation network, the worm Wasserstein generative adversarial network, which generates synthetic time-series data that carry realistic intrinsic patterns with the original data and expands a small sample without prior knowledge or hypotheses for reliability evaluation. After verifying the augmentation ability and demonstrating the quality of the generated data by manual datasets, the proposed method is demonstrated with an experimental case: the online reliability assessment of lithium battery cells. Compared with conventional methods, the proposed method accomplished a breakthrough in the online reliability assessment for an extremely small sample of time-series data and provided credible results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available