4.8 Article

Opinion Dynamics and Minimum Adjustment-Driven Consensus Model for Multi-Criteria Large-Scale Group Decision Making Under a Novel Social Trust Propagation Mechanism

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS
Volume 31, Issue 1, Pages 307-321

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TFUZZ.2022.3186172

Keywords

Bounded confidence; heterogeneous weights; multi-criteria large-scale group decision making (MCLSGDM); optimization consensus model; social trust network (STN)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reaching a consensus in large-scale group decision making is more challenging compared to group decision making due to the large number of decision makers involved. However, there is a lack of research on large-scale group decision making under social trust networks, and opinion dynamics are rarely utilized to analyze the interaction of decision makers. Therefore, this study proposes a multi-criteria large-scale group decision making consensus decision framework and a bounded confidence-based consensus optimization model. The proposed methods and models are further justified and demonstrated through a numerical example and simulation experiments.
Compared with group decision making (GDM), it is more difficult to reach a consensus in large-scale group decision making (LSGDM) owing to the large number of decision makers (DMs). Moreover, studies on LSGDM under social trust networks are obviously fewer than those on GDM, and rarely utilize opinion dynamics to analyze the interaction of DMs. Therefore, in the context of multi-criteria large-scale group decision making (MCLSGDM), an MCLSGDM consensus decision framework and a bounded confidence-based consensus optimization model are proposed. First, a trust propagation method considering the relative importance of the trust degrees (TDs) is proposed. Then, a two-stage process of obtaining DMs' opinions based on opinion dynamics is developed to analyze the interaction of DMs before clustering. Furthermore, a new method for determining the heterogeneous weights of DMs and subgroups is discussed. Finally, to consider the adjustment willingness of DMs, this study proposes a two-stage optimization consensus model based on bounded confidence. In addition, a numerical example is used to further elaborate the above methods and models, and highlight their rationality and superiority through a series of simulation experiments and comparative analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available