4.5 Article

On Autonomous Dynamic Software Ecosystems

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT
Volume 69, Issue 6, Pages 3633-3647

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2021.3116873

Keywords

Autonomy; collaborative aspects; dynamic ecosystems; smart behavior; software ecosystems; software product lines; trust

Funding

  1. ERDF CyberSecurity, CyberCrime, and Critical Information Infrastructures Center of Excellence [CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000822]
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme [952702]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the evolution of software ecosystems, introducing the concept of autonomous dynamic ecosystems. Through four industrial examples, the main features and technology requirements of this new type of ecosystems are characterized.
Software ecosystems are considered the natural evolution of software product lines. A software ecosystem provides a (software) product within a particular business and organizational context that supports the exchange of activities and services within a domain. However, the increasing degree of autonomy demanded by software ecosystems is elevating the system response to end users, while the existing software ecosystem architectures are not well prepared to deal with the dynamicity of context changes and autonomous behavior needs. In order to provide a transition toward an increased level of autonomy, in this article, we introduce the notion of autonomous dynamic ecosystems as representative of those software ecosystems able to support dynamic, smart, and autonomous features demanded by modern software systems. In this work, we further investigate and provide evidence of four industrial examples that have fully embodied the principles of autonomous dynamic ecosystems, and we characterize the main features and technology requirements of this kind of new ecosystems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available