4.5 Article

Commission Pricing Strategy on Online Retail Platforms: Power and Dependence in Triad

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT
Volume 69, Issue 6, Pages 2769-2780

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2019.2957923

Keywords

Pricing; Economics; Contracts; Biological system modeling; Supply chains; Analytical models; Advertising; Commission fee; game theory; online retailing; pricing strategy

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71432003, 91646109]
  2. Youth Team Program for Technology Innovation of Sichuan Province [2016TD0013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article, we investigate alternative commission pricing strategies in online platform sales. Through game modeling and equilibrium solutions, we analyze the economic results for the online platform and vendors. Our findings reveal that vendors can take actions to maximize their own benefit and competing vendors can respond to their rival's choices to minimize negative impact. We also find that the leader vendor's exclusive pricing right results in a higher commission fee paid to the online platform. Overall, our study shows the adaptability of a combined theoretical strategy in interfirm networks.
With the increasing popularity of online retailing, in this article, we investigate the alternative online operation strategies regarding commission price when selling through the online platforms. We exploit a triadic network setting that consists of one online platform firm and two competing vendors and examine the strategic choice of the involved parties to effectively compete in the marketplace. We develop the game models for alternative commission pricing strategies and obtain the equilibrium solutions. Through a comparison of equilibrium solutions, our analysis reveals that alternative commission pricing strategies lead to the different economic results for the online platform and the two vendors individually and collectively. While vendors can take necessary actions (e.g., an additional fee for an exclusive pricing right) to maximize their own benefit, competing vendors can also respond to their rival's strategic choice to minimize the negative impact of the deal reached by the other two parties. Our findings also suggest that the exclusive pricing right that the leader vendor tries to secure results in a higher commission fee paid to the online platform. Through modeling strategic behavior and consequential economic results in the setting of a triad network, our research also responds to the proposition that the structural and behavioral approaches represent incommensurable ideas, and we show that a combined theoretical strategy appears well adapted to the complex realities of interfirm networks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available