4.6 Article

Forming-Free HfO2-Based Resistive Random Access Memory by X-Ray Irradiation

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES
Volume 69, Issue 12, Pages 6705-6709

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TED.2022.3215932

Keywords

Current-fitting; forming; free; irradiation; resistance random access memory (RRAM)

Funding

  1. Taiwan Semiconductor Research Institute [JDP111-Y1-032]
  2. National Science and Technology Council [MOST 109-2112-M-110-015-MY3, MOST 111-2221-E-A49-170-MY2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work proposes a forming-free HfO2-based RRAM using X-ray irradiation, which overcomes the need for a larger forming voltage in the conventional forming process with scaling. Additionally, large irradiation area benefits mass production of memory devices. The forming-free device shows better memory window and comparable reliability compared to the device without X-ray irradiation. Through current-fitting technique and irradiation experiments, a physical model is proposed to explain the mechanism of forming-free RRAM from X-ray irradiation.
This work proposes forming-free HfO2-based resistance random access memory (RRAM) using X-ray irradiation which overcomes the bottleneck of the conventional forming process, that of the need for a larger forming voltage with scaling. In addition, a large irradiation area is beneficial to the mass production of memory devices. This forming-free device has a better memory window compared to the device without X-ray irradiation. Moreover, the forming-free device has good reliability as the device without X-ray irradiation. To analyze the physical mechanism, the conduction mechanism was investigated by the current-fitting technique, and irradiation experiments with varying X-ray energies and times were performed. Finally, a physical model is proposed to explain the mechanism of the forming-free RRAM from X-ray irradiation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available