Accelerating Neural Network Inference With Processing-in-DRAM: From the Edge to the Cloud

Neural networks (NNs) are growing in importance and complexity. An NN's performance (and energy efficiency) can be bound either by computation or memory resources. The processing-in-memory (PIM) paradigm, where computation is placed near or within memory arrays, is a viable solution to accelerate memory-bound NNs. However, PIM architectures vary in form, where different PIM approaches lead to different tradeoffs. Our goal is to analyze, discuss, and contrast dynamic random-access memory (DRAM)-based PIM architectures for NN performance and energy efficiency. To do so, we analyze three state-of-the-art PIM architectures: 1) UPMEM, which integrates processors and DRAM arrays into a single 2-D chip, 2) Mensa, a 3-D-stacking-based PIM architecture tailored for edge devices, and 3) SIMDRAM, which uses the analog principles of DRAM to execute bit-serial operations. Our analysis reveals that PIM greatly benefits memory-bound NNs: 1) UPMEM provides 23x the performance of a high-end graphics processing unit (GPU) when the GPU requires memory oversubscription for a general matrix-vector multiplication kernel, 2) Mensa improves energy efficiency and throughput by 3.0x and 3.1x over the baseline Edge tensor processing unit for 24 Google edge NN models, and 3) SIMDRAM outperforms a central processing unit/graphics processing unit by 16.7x/1.4x for three binary NNs. We conclude that the ideal PIM architecture for NN models depends on a model's distinct attributes, due to the inherent architectural design choices.

Automated summary

Neural networks (NNs) are becoming increasingly important and complex. Processing-in-memory (PIM) paradigm can accelerate memory-bound NNs, but different PIM architectures have different effects on NN performance and energy efficiency.