4.7 Article

Applications of a Thermal-Based Two-Source Energy Balance Model Coupling the Sun-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence Data

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LGRS.2023.3240996

Keywords

Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF); two-source energy balance model (TSEB); water use efficiency (WUE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantifying and monitoring land surface evapotranspiration (ET) is crucial for understanding the earth's water, energy, and carbon cycles. This study developed an empirical relationship between sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) and plant transpiration (T) at ecosystem scale, and coupled it with the two-source energy balance model (TSEB-SIF) to estimate ET components. The TSEB-SIF model outperformed the TSEB model in estimating ET, particularly under water deficit conditions, and provided more accurate partitioning of T from ET.
Quantifying and monitoring land surface evapotranspiration (ET) is an essential task for understanding the earth's water, energy, and carbon cycles. ET, specifically plant transpiration ( T ), is closely linked to the photosynthesis, which is coupled through stomatal function. However, the mechanistic links between sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) information indicating canopy photosynthetic activity and $T$ are complex and difficult to derive empirically. An empirical SIF- $T$ relationship at ecosystem scale was developed and coupled to the two-source energy balance model (TSEB-SIF) to estimate the ET and its components, $T$ and soil evaporation, E . By comparing model predictions with observations from an irrigated cropland site located in a semiarid region, the TSEB-SIF model shows a slightly better performance to the TSEB model in estimating ET, especially under water deficit conditions. Moreover, the TSEB-SIF model more reliably partitioned the $T$ from ET, while the TSEB model tended to overestimate the contribution of T to ET.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available