4.6 Article

Coexistence of Bipolar and Unipolar Resistive Switching Behavior in Amorphous Ga2O3 Based Resistive Random Access Memory Device

Journal

IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 237-240

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LED.2022.3230247

Keywords

Bipolar resistive switching (BRS); unipolar resistive switching (URS); gallium oxide (Ga2O3); resistive random access memory (RRAM)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A memory device with an Ag/Ga2O3/Pt structure has been successfully fabricated, exhibiting both bipolar resistive switching (BRS) and unipolar resistive switching (URS) behaviors. It was found that the bipolar and unipolar modes can be set by applying a positive voltage with the same compliance current (I-cc) of 1 mA. The reset process involves a polarity change of sweeping voltages without I-cc to switch between the bipolar and unipolar modes. The conduction mechanisms are identified as conducting filaments (CFs) for the low resistance state (LRS), and schottky emission for BRS, and space charge limited conduction mechanism for URS in the high resistance states (HRS), respectively.
Herein, the memory device with a structure of Ag/Ga2O3/Pt has been successfully achieved, and the coexistence of bipolar resistive switching (BRS) and unipolar resistive switching (URS) behaviors are observed. The results show that the set process of bipolar and unipolar modes can be performed only when a positive voltage is applied with the same compliance current (I-cc) of 1 mA. For the reset process, the conversion process between bipolar and unipolar modes occurs by changing the polarity of sweeping voltages without I-cc. The conduction mechanisms in two modes are conducting filaments (CFs) for the low resistance state (LRS). But for the high resistance states (HRS), it is schottky emission in BRS and space charge limited conduction mechanism in URS, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available