4.6 Article

Experimental Demonstration of Compact S-Band MW-Level Metamaterial-Inspired Klystron

Journal

IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS
Volume 44, Issue 1, Pages 152-155

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LED.2022.3223909

Keywords

Complementary electric split ring resonator; miniaturization; klystron; MW-level; high efficiency

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this experiment, an S-band MW-level metamaterial-inspired klystron using all-metal complementary electric split ring resonators (CeSRRs) was successfully realized. The miniaturized structure of this klystron has a volume of only 0.44 of conventional counterparts. In the hot-test, the klystron delivered a maximum output power of 5.51 MW, with a gain of 55.6 dB and electronic efficiency of 57.4% at 2.852 GHz. This compact metamaterial-inspired klystron has potential applications in proton therapy facilities, tokamaks for the low-hybrid wave heating, and accelerators.
Metamaterials are artificially constructed subwavelength structures exhibiting unprecedented electromagnetic phenomena. In this letter, an S-band MW-level metamaterial-inspired klystron using all-metal complementary electric split ring resonators (CeSRRs) was realized in the experiment. The CeSRR-loaded interaction structure of the klystron developed here features a miniaturized structure, the volume of which is only about 0.44 of the conventional counterparts. The metamaterial-inspired klystron based on the interaction structure loaded with CeSRRs was designed, fabricated and assembled. Using a pencil beam with parameters of 120 kV/80 A in the hot-test, the klystron delivered the biggest output power of 5.51 MW with gain of 55.6 dB and electronic efficiency of 57.4% at 2.852 GHz. This compact metamaterial-inspired klystron has potential applications in proton therapy facilities, tokamaks for the low-hybrid wave heating, and accelerators.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available