4.5 Article

The young resurfacing events at Ceres' Occator crater: Seismic shaking or deposition of cryovolcanic material?

Journal

ICARUS
Volume 389, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2022.115259

Keywords

Ceres; Cratering; Geological processes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the young resurfacing absolute model ages at the floor of Occator crater on dwarf planet Ceres and explored the potential causes for these resurfacing events. The results suggest that seismic shaking may not be responsible for the observed young resurfacing, while the deposition of young cryovolcanic material seems to be the most plausible explanation.
In this study we investigated the previously observed young resurfacing absolute model ages at the floor of Occator crater on dwarf planet Ceres on the basis of Dawn data. These young resurfacing absolute model ages have been interpreted to represent the deposition of cryovolcanic material >10 Myr after the formation of Occator crater. In our study we investigated whether these resurfacing events are caused by deposition of cryovolcanic material, or if seismic shaking related to the formation or reactivation of prominent fracture systems at the floor of Occator crater might be responsible for the resurfacing. We chose 22 different count areas with differing distances to the fractures and determined absolute model ages of these areas by performing crater sizefrequency distribution measurements. Most of our measurements show the formation age of Occator crater (similar to 21 Ma) as background age, but also different sets of resurfacing ages, varying from 3.7 Ma to 9.2 Ma. A trend towards younger absolute model ages with decreasing distance to fractures is not supported by our data. Thus, we conclude that seismic shaking might not be responsible for the young resurfacing events spread all over the floor of Occator crater. Moreover, our investigations show that target property effects and differing image resolutions do not affect our measurements significantly. Consequently, deposition of young cryovolcanic material seems to be the most plausible geologic process being responsible for the observed young resurfacing ages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available