4.2 Article

Molecular evaluation of selected mango genotypes grown in Egypt using SCoT and ISSR markers

Journal

HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE
Volume 49, Issue 4, Pages 213-224

Publisher

CZECH ACADEMY AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.17221/112/2021-HORTSCI

Keywords

Mangifera indica L.; molecular marker; identification; germplasm

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the genetic relationship among 23 mango genotypes using SCoT and ISSR markers. The results showed that four newly introduced mango genotypes were novel genetic resources and can be utilized for future breeding programs in Egypt. This study provides valuable information for the conservation and utilization of mango cultivation and genetic resources.
The mango (Mangifera indica L.) is a common tropical and subtropical fruit and the second main fruit crop in Egypt. In this work, start codon targeted (SCoT) and inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers were employed to study the genetic relationship among twenty-three mango genotypes grown under the El-Giza district conditions. These genotypes consist of four newly introduced cultivars, six new progenies and thirteen closely related mango cultivars which were included as cultivar references for the best definition. Based on the overall SCoT and ISSR data, a total of 52 bands were generated (18 for SCoT and 34 for ISSR) with a total polymorphic percentage equal to 53.84% (44.44% for SCoT and 58.82% for ISSR). Based on the whole set of SCoT and ISSR marker data, the genetic similarity coefficients ranged from 80 to 97% with a mean equal to 88.5% and the first two principal axes explained about 31% of the total genetic variation among the mango accessions. The SCoT and ISSR data revealed that the four newly introduced mango genotypes, namely 'Aya', 'Kasturi', 'Maya' and 'Omer', are novel genetic resources based on their genetic profiles, which can be used for future breeding programmes in Egypt.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available