4.3 Article

Early fate bias in neuroepithelial progenitors of hippocampal neurogenesis

Journal

HIPPOCAMPUS
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages 391-401

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/hipo.23482

Keywords

clonal relationships; fate choice; fate specification; neuroepithelial precursors; neuroepithelial stem cells

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article reports that hippocampal adult neural stem cells are derived from progeny of the neuroepithelial lineage during murine brain development. By analyzing thousands of clonally related cells using single-cell RNA-seq of barcoded clones, the researchers found evidence of early fate restriction of neuroepithelial stem cells to either neurogenic progenitor cells or non-neurogenic oligodendrogenic fate supplying cells for different hippocampal regions. This study provides new insights into the phenomenon of early fate restriction guiding the development of postnatal hippocampal neurogenesis.
Hippocampal adult neural stem cells emerge from progeny of the neuroepithelial lineage during murine brain development. Hippocampus development is increasingly well understood. However, the clonal relationships between early neuroepithelial stem cells and postnatal neurogenic cells remain unclear, especially at the single-cell level. Here we report fate bias and gene expression programs in thousands of clonally related cells in the juvenile hippocampus based on single-cell RNA-seq of barcoded clones. We find evidence for early fate restriction of neuroepithelial stem cells to either neurogenic progenitor cells of the dentate gyrus region or oligodendrogenic, non-neurogenic fate supplying cells for other hippocampal regions including gray matter areas and the Cornu ammonis region 1/3. Our study provides new insights into the phenomenon of early fate restriction guiding the development of postnatal hippocampal neurogenesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available