4.4 Article

Evaluation of salivary oxidate stress biomarkers, nitric oxide and C-reactive protein in patients with oral lichen planus and burning mouth syndrome

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORAL PATHOLOGY & MEDICINE
Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages 387-392

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jop.12522

Keywords

antioxidant capacity; burning mouth syndrome; markers of oxidative stress; oral lichen planus; saliva

Funding

  1. Program 'Juan de la Cierva' of 'Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad', Spain
  2. Seneca Foundation of Murcia Region [19894/GERM/15]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate oxidative stress factors and C-reactive protein in the saliva of patients with oral lichen planus (OLP) and burning mouth syndrome (BMS). MethodsThis consecutive, cross-sectional study included 20 patients with OLP, 19 with burning mouth syndrome (BMS), and 31 control subjects. The oral cavity of each patient was examined and patients responded to a quality of life questionnaire (OHIP-14) and the xerostomia inventory. The following parameters were measured in whole non-stimulated saliva: trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC); total antioxidant capacity (TAC); cupric reducing antioxidant capacity (CUPRAC); ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP); C-reactive protein (CRP); nitric oxide; nitrates; and nitrites. ResultsThe OLP group presented statistically significant differences in reactive oxygen species (ROS) (29 600 cps) in comparison with the control group (39 679 cps) (P < 0.05). In the BMS group, ROS was 29 707 cps with significant difference in comparison with the control group (P < 0.05). Significantly higher salivary nitric oxide (145.7 mol) and nitrite (141.0 mol) levels were found in OLP patients in comparison with control group (P < 0.05). ConclusionIncreases in nitric oxide and C-reactive protein were found in the saliva of OLP patients in comparison with BMS and control patients. Further studies are required to confirm these findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available