4.4 Article

How to implant leadless pacemakers and mitigate major complications

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Development and validation of a risk score for predicting pericardial effusion in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation: experience with the Micra transcatheter pacemaker

Jonathan P. Piccini et al.

Summary: This study aimed to identify predictors and develop a risk score for pericardial effusion in patients undergoing Micra leadless pacemaker implantation. A risk score based on pre-procedural clinical variables was developed, showing reasonable discrimination for predicting pericardial effusion. The rate of pericardial effusion decreased over time and was associated with the number of Micra deployments.

EUROPACE (2022)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up

Mikhael F. El-Chami et al.

Summary: The Micra leadless VVI pacemaker showed lower rates of reinterventions and chronic complications compared to transvenous VVI pacing in a real-world study of US Medicare patients, with no difference in all-cause mortality at 2 years.

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL (2022)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Leadless pacemaker perforations: Clinical consequences and related device and user problems

Robert G. Hauser et al.

Summary: This study examines the consequences of Micra pacemaker perforations and related problems, finding that they are often associated with death and major complications requiring emergency intervention. Device and operator use problems account for at least half of the perforations.

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY (2022)

Review Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Leadless Pacing: Where We Currently Stand and What the Future Holds

Rand Ibrahim et al.

Summary: This article reviews the safety and efficacy data of leadless pacemakers (LPs) as alternative cardiac implantable devices for bradyarrhythmia treatment. It found that LPs have a lower rate of device-related complications compared to traditional pacemakers, but a higher and more severe rate of pericardial effusion. As we transition to multi-chamber LPs, the safety and efficacy of these devices need to be ensured.

CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS (2022)

Letter Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Primary Results on Safety and Efficacy From the LEADLESS II-Phase 2 Worldwide Clinical Trial

Vivek Y. Reddy et al.

JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY (2022)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Life cycle management of Micra transcatheter pacing system: Data from a high-volume center

Neal K. Bhatia et al.

Summary: Limited background data exists on the management of Micra transcatheter pacing system during an upgrade or battery depletion. A large study showed that 6% of patients implanted with a Micra required a system modification during long-term follow-up, mainly due to the need for CRT pacing. These patients were successfully managed with extraction or abandonment.

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY (2021)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Major adverse clinical events associated with implantation of a leadless intracardiac pacemaker

Robert G. Hauser et al.

Summary: Leadless intracardiac pacemakers like the Medtronic Micra were developed to reduce complications. However, a study comparing MACE associated with Micra implantation to CapSureFix transvenous pacing leads found a higher incidence of major adverse clinical events with Micra, including higher rates of tamponade, death, and the need for rescue thoracotomies. Micra patients also had higher rates of complications such as requiring CPR and suffering from hypotension or shock compared to CapSureFix recipients.

HEART RHYTHM (2021)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Left femoral venous access for leadless pacemaker implantation: patient characteristics and outcomes

Julius Jelisejevas et al.

Summary: This study compared the safety and effectiveness of Micra TPS implantation via left femoral venous access with the conventional right-sided approach and found that both methods were similar in terms of implantation success and outcomes. Left femoral venous access was more commonly used in patients who had undergone a previous transfemoral TAVI procedure.

EUROPACE (2021)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Contemporaneous Comparison of Outcomes Among Patients Implanted With a Leadless vs Transvenous Single-Chamber Ventricular Pacemaker

Jonathan P. Piccini et al.

Summary: This study compared patient characteristics and complications between patients implanted with leadless VVI and transvenous VVI pacemakers. Despite significant differences in patient characteristics, patients with leadless VVI pacemakers had higher rates of pericardial effusion and/or perforation but lower rates of other device-related complications and revisions at 6 months.

JAMA CARDIOLOGY (2021)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

A Predictive Model for the Long-Term Electrical Performance of a Leadless Transcatheter Pacemaker

Soroosh Kiani et al.

Summary: This study aimed to develop a predictive model for the long-term electrical performance of Micra pacemaker. Factors such as history of diabetes, male sex, elevated pacing capture threshold, and low impedance at implantation were identified as independent predictors of elevated thresholds at 12 months in patients with Micra pacemaker.

JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY (2021)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

A comparison of figure-of-8-suture versus manual compression for venous access closure after cardiac procedures: An updated meta-analysis

Mark Terence Mujer et al.

PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY (2020)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Techniques for successful early retrieval of the Micra transcatheter pacing system: A worldwide experience

Muhammad R. Afzal et al.

HEART RHYTHM (2018)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Malignant ventricular tachycardia and cardiac arrest induced by a micra™ leadless pacemaker

Flemming Javier Olsen et al.

JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY (2018)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

How to Implant a Leadless Pacemaker With a Tine-Based Fixation

Mikhael F. El-Chami et al.

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY (2016)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

A Leadless Intracardiac Transcatheter Pacing System

Dwight Reynolds et al.

NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2016)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Complications after cardiac implantable electronic device implantations: an analysis of a complete, nationwide cohort in Denmark

Rikke Esberg Kirkfeldt et al.

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL (2014)

Article Cardiac & Cardiovascular Systems

Preclosure of large-sized venous access sites in adults undergoing transcatheter structural interventions

Tahir Hamid et al.

CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS (2013)