4.8 Article

'Chemistry at the speed of sound': automated 1536-well nanoscale synthesis of 16 scaffolds in parallel

Journal

GREEN CHEMISTRY
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 1380-1394

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d2gc04312b

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We demonstrate the feasibility of synthesizing a large library based on 16 different chemistries in parallel on a nanoscale using highly automated methods. Unlike combinatorial chemistry, we generate 16 scaffolds simultaneously, with each compound produced through a random combination of diverse building blocks in a sparse matrix fashion. The advantages of this automated nanoscale synthesis approach include library diversity, absence of storage logistics, superior economics, faster synthesis through automation, increased safety, and sustainable chemistry.
Screening of large and diverse libraries is the 'bread and butter' in the first phase of the discovery of novel drugs. However, maintenance and periodic renewal of high-quality large compound collections pose considerable logistic, environmental and monetary problems. Here, we exercise an alternative, the 'on-the-fly' synthesis of large and diverse libraries on a nanoscale in a highly automated fashion. For the first time, we show the feasibility of the synthesis of a large library based on 16 different chemistries in parallel on several 384-well plates using the acoustic dispensing ejection (ADE) technology platform. In contrast to combinatorial chemistry, we produced 16 scaffolds at the same time and in a sparse matrix fashion, and each compound was produced by a random combination of diverse large building blocks. The synthesis, analytics, resynthesis of selected compounds, and chemoinformatic analysis of the library are described. The advantages of the herein described automated nanoscale synthesis approach include great library diversity, absence of library storage logistics, superior economics, speed of synthesis by automation, increased safety, and hence sustainable chemistry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available