Journal
GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 261, Issue 5, Pages 1423-1431Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-022-05938-6
Keywords
Recurrent anterior uveitis; Macular edema; Molecular markers; Intercellular adhesion molecule marker ICAM-1; CD5
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The parameters of the T-cell link of the immune response and the parameters of humoral immunity were different between patients with uncomplicated recurrent anterior uveitis (AU) and those with recurrent AU complicated by uveitic macular edema (UME). The patients with UME had increased T-cell immune response parameters and decreased humoral immunity parameters. The relative numbers of natural killer cells and phagocytic neutrophils were also different between the two groups. The expression levels of ICAM-1 and CD5 seem to play a role in uveitic macular edema.
Background Treatment of macular edema in uveitis is a key goal of treatment, because this complication remains a potential therapeutic problem for specialists. Material and methods Examination was carried out in 1-2 groups - 50 persons with uncomplicated recurrent anterior uveitis (AU) in the stage of relapse or remission - and 3-4 groups - 26 persons with recurrent AU complicated by uveitic macular edema (UME) in the stage of relapse or remission of AU. Control group - 27 healthy volunteers. All patients underwent an ophthalmologic examination, using OCT (Spectralis HRA + OCT (Heidelberg Engineering)). The state of cellular and humoral immunity and the expression of activation markers on blood lymphocytes in all patients were assessed. An immunohistocytochemical analysis using monoclonal antibodies (the peroxidase-anti-peroxidase method) was employed to assess the expression of lymphocyte activation markers. The monoclonal antibody panel (MCAP) for immunophenotyping included antibodies reacting with CD5, CD54 (ICAM-1), CD25, and CD95 (FAS) antigens. Immunophenotyping was performed using immunohistochemistry. Results In the patients with AU + UME, the parameters of the T-cell link of the immune response were increased and the parameters of humoral immunity (CD19, IgA, IgG) were decreased in comparison with the uncomplicated AU patients. The absolute and relative numbers of natural killer cells in the peripheral blood were higher, and the relative numbers of phagocytic neutrophils were lower in the group of anterior uveitis with UME than in uncomplicated AU. The absolute and relative expression levels of ICAM-1 (CD54) and the absolute expression level of CD5 on peripheral blood lymphocytes were increased in relapse at patients with AU + UME compared with uncomplicated AU. The expression levels of CD25 and CD95 were not different in these groups. Conclusion Activation of cellular immunity markers ICAM-1 and CD5 seems to play a role in uveitic macular edema. The expression levels of CD25 and CD95 were not significantly different in these groups. Key Messages Uveitic macular edema (UME) is the most common structural complication of uveitis, that often has a resistant course. The pathophysiology of macular edemain uveitisis still completely unknown, the information about it iscontradictory. In the relapsing period of recurrent anterior uveitis complicated by edema of the macula the absolute parameters of cellular immunity (T-total lymphocytes (CD 3), T-helpers (CD 4) and T-cytotoxic lymphocytes (suppressors) (CD 8) were increased and the parameters of humoral immunity (CD 19, IgA, Ig G) were decreased in comparison with uncomplicated uveitis. The absolute and relative numbers of natural killer cells in the peripheral blood were higher, and the relative numbers of phagocytic neutrophils were lower in the group of anterior uveitis with UME than in uncomplicated uveitis. The absolute and relative expression levels of ICAM-1 (CD 54) and the absolute expression level of CD 5 on peripheral blood lymphocytes were increased during the exacerbation of recurrent anterior uveitis complicated by macular edema compared with uncomplicated uveitis. The expression levels of CD 25 and CD 95 were notsignificantly different in these groups.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available