4.5 Article

Association of online health information seeking behavior with levels of knowledge about palliative care among older adults?

Journal

GERIATRIC NURSING
Volume 49, Issue -, Pages 8-12

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.11.004

Keywords

Palliative care; Older adults; Online health information seeking; eHealth

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the knowledge, misconceptions, and predictors of palliative care among older adults using nationally representative data. Findings revealed that a significant proportion of older adults have limited knowledge about palliative care, and there are misconceptions associated with it. Furthermore, utilizing the internet for health information was found to be a significant predictor of palliative care knowledge among older adults.
This study examined the knowledge, misconceptions, and predictors of palliative care among older adults using nationally representative data. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted with 1,390 respondents (> 50 years) from cycle 2 of the 2018 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS). Overall, 63.53% of older adults reported that they had never heard of palliative care. Among those who reported knowledgeable about palliative care, 33.33% thought palliative care is the same as hospice, and 41.42% automatically linked palliative care to death. Ordered logistic regression analysis revealed that online health information seeking behavior is a significant predictor of the level of knowledge about palliative care among older adults. Older adults who utilized the internet for health information were 2.16 (p < .001) times more likely to report being knowledgeable about palliative care than non-internet users. Findings from this study indicate that public health education efforts are needed to increase palliative care knowledge among older adults and the inter -net may be the key to improving health literacy in palliative care for them.(c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available