4.7 Article

The Paucity of Supershear Earthquakes on Large Faults Governed by Rate and State Friction

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 49, Issue 22, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022GL099749

Keywords

supershear rupture; earthquake cycle; supershear transition; rate and state friction; large strike-slip fault

Funding

  1. Universite Cpte d Azur through project PERFAULT-3D - French government through the UCAJEDI Investments in the Future project [ANR-15-IDEX-01]
  2. Chinese government through the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates for the first time the prevalence of supershear ruptures across multiple earthquake cycles on long faults, finding that supershear events only occur in a specific range of friction parameters that are not commonly observed in laboratory experiments, which may explain the rarity of supershear earthquakes.
Supershear earthquakes are rare compared to their subshear counterparts, but the cause for their paucity remains to be understood. We investigate for the first time the prevalence of supershear ruptures across multiple earthquake cycles on long faults using rate-and-state friction and a 2.5D approximation that accounts for the finite seismogenic width W. We find supershear events occur only in a narrow range of friction parameters that is not commonly observed in laboratory experiments, which may explain its rarity in nature. Particularly, the ratio between direct and evolution effects of rate-and-state friction needs to be low (a/b < 0.4) and the nucleation length has to be sufficiently large compared to W, but not too large that it causes a transition from seismic to aseismic slip. Our numerical and analytical developments contribute fundamentally to understanding the state of stress on long faults over multiple earthquake cycles and their potential for hosting supershear earthquakes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available