4.7 Article

Systematic transcriptome analysis associated with physiological and chronological aging in Caenorhabditis elegans

Journal

GENOME RESEARCH
Volume 32, Issue 11-12, Pages 2003-2014

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/gr.276515.121

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (MSIT) [NRF-2019R1A3B2067745]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Our study analyzed the relationship between transcriptomic features and physiological and chronological aging using Caenorhabditis elegans as a model. We found that noncoding RNAs and intron-derived transcripts were up-regulated with chronological aging, while mRNAs with many biological functions were down-regulated with physiological aging. Additionally, an increase in the usage of distal 3' splice sites in mRNA transcripts was identified as a biomarker for physiological aging.
Aging is associated with changes in a variety of biological processes at the transcriptomic level, including gene expression. Two types of aging occur during a lifetime: chronological and physiological aging. However, dissecting the difference between chronological and physiological ages at the transcriptomic level has been a challenge because of its complexity. We analyzed the transcriptomic features associated with physiological and chronological aging using Caenorhabditis elegans as a model. Many structural and functional transcript elements, such as noncoding RNAs and intron-derived transcripts, were up-regulated with chronological aging. In contrast, mRNAs with many biological functions, including RNA processing, were down-regulated with physiological aging. We also identified an age-dependent increase in the usage of distal 3 ' splice sites in mRNA transcripts as a biomarker of physiological aging. Our study provides crucial information for dissecting chronological and physiological aging at the transcriptomic level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available