4.3 Article

Unifying baryogenesis with dark matter production

Journal

GENERAL RELATIVITY AND GRAVITATION
Volume 55, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10714-023-03079-7

Keywords

Classical theories of gravity; Baryogenesis; Dark matter; Inflation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We propose a mechanism that predicts both baryon asymmetry and dark matter origin at early times. This mechanism recovers spontaneous baryogenesis during the reheating process. By working with U(1)-invariant quark and lepton fields, we achieve a symmetry breaking and get a pseudo Nambu-Goldstone boson. This boson speeds up the Universe during inflation and enables baryogenesis.
We here propose a mechanism that predicts, at early times, both baryon asymmetry and dark matter origin and that recovers the spontaneous baryogenesis during the reheating. Working with U(1)-invariant quark Q and lepton L effective fields, with an interacting term that couples the evolution of Universe's environment field 1', we require a spontaneous symmetry breaking and get a pseudo Nambu-Goldstone boson theta. The pseudo Nambu-Goldstone boson speeds the Universe up during inflation, playing the role of inflaton, enabling baryogenesis to occur. Thus, in a quasi-static approximation over 1', we impressively find both baryon and dark matter quasi-particle production rates, unifying de facto the two scenarios. Moreover, we outline particle mixing and demonstrate dark matter takes over baryons. Presupposing that theta field energy density dominates as baryogenesis stops and employing recent limits on reheating temperature, we get numerical bounds over dark matter constituent, showing that the most likely dark matter would be consistent with MeV-scale mass candidates. Finally, we briefly underline our predictions are suitable to explain the the low-energy electron recoil event excess between 1 and 7 keV found by the XENON1T collaboration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available