4.7 Review

Mechanism, performance and modification methods for NH3-SCR catalysts: A review

Journal

FUEL
Volume 331, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125885

Keywords

NH3-SCR; Catalyst; NOx reduction; Modified methods

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article systematically reviews the modification methods of catalysts in selective catalytic reduction (SCR) technology, analyzes the effects of various catalyst parameters on denitrification efficiency, and discusses the influences of spatial structure on catalytic effect. Additionally, it compares the performance of catalysts with different components and summarizes the current problems in catalyst research. The development of NH3-SCR technology is also prospected.
Air pollution and climate issues are becoming serious, and particularly NOx cause acid rain, ozone hole and disease of respiratory system for humans, which mainly come from automobile and industrial exhaust emissions. Selective catalyst reduction (SCR) with NH3 as reducing agent is widely employed to eliminate NOx, and the selection of catalyst has a decisive effect in the final conversion. The modification methods of catalysts, such as addition of second metal, replacement of support, optimization of structure, pretreatment and post-treatment are systematically reviewed. For zeolite catalysts, the reaction mechanism and SO2 poisoning theory are analyzed. In addition, effects of catalyst parameters on denitrification efficiency are summarized, including Si/Al ratio, Cu or Fe loading, specific surface area, coordination structure and calcination temperature. Effects of spatial structure of spinel and perovskite catalysts on catalytic effect are analyzed, and the performance of catalysts with different components is compared. Finally, the current problems of catalyst research are summarized and the development of NH3-SCR technology are prospected.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available