4.7 Article

1H NMR as a simple methodology for differentiating barn and free-range chicken eggs

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 396, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133720

Keywords

PUFA; Chemometrics; Metabolomics; Cholesterol; Fatty acids; PLS-DA

Funding

  1. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos FINEP
  2. Coordenac ~ao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior -CAPES
  3. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnol 'ogico CNPq

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the lipid profile of chicken eggs produced in conventional and free-range systems using H-1 NMR. It found that free-range eggs had higher concentrations of omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids. The study also showed that a specific signal ratio could accurately classify different samples. These findings are important for quality control and fraud prevention in the egg industry.
The conventional intensive system produces cheap and safe chicken eggs, but exposes the animals to stress due to overcrowding on farms. This work compared the H-1 NMR lipidic profile of chicken eggs produced in conventional and free-range systems. Sample preparation consisted of a single-step extraction and centrifugation, and the H-1 NMR experimental time was just 3 min per sample. Eggs from free-range chickens had higher concentrations of omega-3 and omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids. The ratio between the signals at delta 2.85 and 4.14 from bisallylic polyunsaturated fatty acids and glycerol moiety, respectively, was able to correctly classify 93.8 % of the samples. These results were similar to those of PLS-DA, used for comparative purposes. Therefore, the proposed method could be easily used to assist quality control and fraud prevention in the egg industry. Free-range eggs had higher concentrations of cholesterol but, as they are smaller, similar amounts to conventional ones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available