4.4 Article

Investigation of the effect of refining on the presence of targeted mineral oil aromatic hydrocarbons in coconut oil

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19440049.2022.2164621

Keywords

Mineral oil aromatic hydrocarbons (MOAH); refining; deodorization; fats; LC-GCxGC-FID

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of refining on the most toxicologically relevant fraction of MOAH contamination in coconut oil. A fully integrated platform consisting of LC, LC-GC x GC, and FID was used to obtain a more detailed characterization of the MOAH sub-classes distribution. The results showed that refining effectively removed naphthalenes and significantly reduced benzo(a)pyrenes.
The goal of this work was to investigate the impact of refining on coconut oil particularly on the most toxicologically relevant fraction of the mineral oil aromatic hydrocarbon (MOAH) contamination, namely the fraction composed by the three to seven aromatic rings. A fully integrated platform consisting of a liquid chromatography (LC), a comprehensive multidimensional gas chromatography (GC) (LC-GC x GC) and flame ionization detector (FID) was used to obtained a more detailed characterization of the MOAH sub-classes distribution. The revised EN pr 16995:2017-08 official method was used for preparing the samples, both with and without the auxiliary epoxidation step. Crude coconut oil was spiked with different MOAH standards, namely naphthalenes, alkylated naphthalenes, benzo(a)pyrene, and its alkylated homologues. Refining was modelled by deodorization at 230 degrees C, stripping with 10 kg/h of steam under 1 mbar vacuum for 3 h. Complete removal of the naphthalenes and reduction of more than 98.8% of the benzo(a)pyrenes was observed. Epoxidation had a significant impact on the MOAH fraction with more than three rings, but with a high dependency on the sample matrix, being significantly less evident in the refined samples than in the crude ones.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available