4.6 Review

Advances in the chemical constituents, pharmacological properties and clinical applications of TCM formula Yupingfeng San

Journal

FITOTERAPIA
Volume 164, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fitote.2022.105385

Keywords

Yupingfeng san; Chemical constituent; Pharmacology; Clinical application; TCM formula

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review summarized the chemical compositions, pharmacology, and safety of Yupingfeng San (YPFS), a commonly used traditional Chinese medicine formula for various respiratory diseases. It highlighted the importance of its chemical constituents in specific pathological processes and provided essential data and references for clinical applications of YPFS.
Yupingfeng San (YPFS) is a famous and commonly used traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) formula for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, respiratory tract infections, and pneumonia in China. It is composed of three Chinese herbs, including Astragali Radix, Atractylodis Macrocephalae Rhizoma and Saposhnikoviae Radix. In this review, the relevant references on YPFS were searched in the Web of Science, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and other databases. Literatures published from 2000 to 2022 were screened and summarized. The constituents in YPFS could be classified into nine groups according to their structures, including flavonoids, saponins, essential oils, coumarins, lactones, amino acids, organic acids, saccharides, chromones and others. The importance of chemical constituents in YPFS were demonstrated for specific pathological processes including immunoregulatory, anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor and pulmonary diseases. This article systematically reviewed the up-to-date information on its chemical compositions, phar-macology and safety, that could be used as essential data and reference for clinical applications of YPFS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available