4.6 Article

Harvest control rules used in US federal fisheries management and implications for climate resilience

Journal

FISH AND FISHERIES
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 248-262

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/faf.12724

Keywords

acceptable biological catch; catch limit; catch quota; climate change; Magnuson-Stevens Act; overfishing limit

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Climate change is impacting marine fisheries productivity and the effectiveness of historical management approaches. Harvest control rules offer a way to enhance climate resilience, but the flexibility in specifying these rules has resulted in a variety of approaches with varying levels of resilience to climate change. We examined the control rules for all 507 US federally managed fish stocks and identified seven typologies, along with their advantages and disadvantages for managing fisheries under climate change. Based on our findings, we provide seven recommendations to improve the resilience of US federally managed fisheries to climate change.
Climate change is altering the productivity of marine fisheries and challenging the effectiveness of historical fisheries management. Harvest control rules, which describe the process for determining catch limits in fisheries, represent one pathway for promoting climate resilience. In the USA, flexibility in how regional management councils specify harvest control rules has spawned diverse approaches for reducing catch limits to precautionarily buffer against scientific and management uncertainty, some of which may be more or less resilient to climate change. Here, we synthesize the control rules used to manage all 507 US federally managed fish stocks and stock complexes. We classified these rules into seven typologies: (1) catch-based; (2) constant catch; (3) constant escapement; (4) constant F; (5) stepped F; (6) ramped F and (7) both stepped and ramped F. We also recorded whether the control rules included a biomass limit ('cut-off') value or were environmentally linked as well as the type and size of the buffers used to protect against scientific and/or management uncertainty. Finally, we review the advantages and disadvantages of each typology for managing fisheries under climate change and provide seven recommendations for updating harvest control rules to improve the resilience of US federally managed fisheries to climate change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available