4.6 Review

Artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of retinopathy of prematurity: A systematic review of current algorithms

Journal

EYE
Volume 37, Issue 12, Pages 2518-2526

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-022-02366-y

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

With the increasing survival of premature infants, there is a growing demand for better retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) services. Wide field retinal imaging (WFDRI) and artificial intelligence (AI) have shown promise in improving ROP diagnosis and reducing the workload of screening ophthalmologists. This review systematically summarizes the diagnostic characteristics of existing deep learning algorithms, highlighting their potential in diagnosing ROP and providing an automated severity score. AI techniques have demonstrated comparable accuracy and sensitivity to ophthalmologists. However, more evidence is needed before AI can be used as a sole diagnostic tool.
Background/Objectives With the increasing survival of premature infants, there is an increased demand to provide adequate retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) services. Wide field retinal imaging (WFDRI) and artificial intelligence (AI) have shown promise in the field of ROP and have the potential to improve the diagnostic performance and reduce the workload for screening ophthalmologists. The aim of this review is to systematically review and provide a summary of the diagnostic characteristics of existing deep learning algorithms. Subject/Methods Two authors independently searched the literature, and studies using a deep learning system from retinal imaging were included. Data were extracted, assessed and reported using PRISMA guidelines. Results Twenty-seven studies were included in this review. Nineteen studies used AI systems to diagnose ROP, classify the staging of ROP, diagnose the presence of pre-plus or plus disease, or assess the quality of retinal images. The included studies reported a sensitivity of 71%-100%, specificity of 74-99% and area under the curve of 91-99% for the primary outcome of the study. AI techniques were comparable to the assessment of ophthalmologists in terms of overall accuracy and sensitivity. Eight studies evaluated vascular severity scores and were able to accurately differentiate severity using an automated classification score. Conclusion Artificial intelligence for ROP diagnosis is a growing field, and many potential utilities have already been identified, including the presence of plus disease, staging of disease and a new automated severity score. AI has a role as an adjunct to clinical assessment; however, there is insufficient evidence to support its use as a sole diagnostic tool currently.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available