4.7 Article

Inter-subject cognitive workload estimation based on a cascade ensemble of multilayer autoencoders

Journal

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
Volume 211, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118694

Keywords

Cognitive workload; Stacked denoising autoencoder; Extreme learning machine; Electroencephalogram; Abstraction fusion

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes an individual-independent workload estimator by adapting EEG data recorded from different individuals, achieving the goal of predicting cognitive workload levels.
Machine learning approaches can build a computational model to predict cognitive workload levels by using electroencephalogram (EEG) feature inputs at the same time instant. However, when the EEG signals are recorded on different people, the accuracy of such a model could be impaired due to its incapability of fitting varied statistical distributions across different individuals. To this end, we propose an individual-independent workload estimator, a cascade ensemble of multilayer autoencoders to tackle the individual difference within the EEG features. It could assess the workload levels of an unseen subject by adapting the EEG data recorded from non-overlapped existing subjects. We first construct a deep stacked denoising autoencoder to abstract EEG features from a specific individual. Its shallow weights are optimized with individual-specific geometrical information of the features. Then, to find generalizable feature properties, we introduce Q-statistics to measure the independence between base learners. Finally, a regularized extreme learning machine is used as a cascade metaclassifier to fuse and filter high-level EEG abstractions and determine workload levels. We employ databases from two different experiments to validate our approach. The proposed framework can lead to acceptable accuracy and computational complexity compared to several existing workload classifiers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available