4.5 Review

The impact of switching from single-use to reusable healthcare products: a transparency checklist and systematic review of life-cycle assessments

Related references

Note: Only part of the references are listed.
Article Surgery

Environmental impact and life cycle financial cost of hybrid (reusable/single-use) instruments versus single-use equivalents in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Chantelle Rizan et al.

Summary: The environmental impact and financial costs of using hybrid surgical instruments for laparoscopic surgery are lower compared to single-use equivalents, providing significant benefits. The reduced carbon footprint and cost savings of hybrid instruments can play an important role in helping surgeries meet carbon reduction targets.

SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES (2022)

Article Green & Sustainable Science & Technology

Reducing the Environmental Impact of Sterilization Packaging for Surgical Instruments in the Operating Room: A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Disposable versus Reusable Systems

Herman J. Friedericy et al.

Summary: The use of single-use polypropylene packaging for sterilization of surgical instruments is causing significant environmental pollution and plastic waste. This study compares the environmental impact of this packaging method with a reusable sterilization container. The results show that the reusable container has significantly less environmental impact and can provide ecological advantages after a certain number of use cycles, depending on the hospital size. Considering the comparable cost and quality of the two packaging systems, choosing the reusable container on a global scale can result in large environmental gains.

SUSTAINABILITY (2022)

Article Environmental Sciences

Life cycle assessment of stainless-steel reusable speculums versus disposable acrylic speculums in a university clinic setting: a case study

Monica I. Rodriguez Morris et al.

Summary: This study conducted a life cycle assessment to compare the environmental impacts of disposable and reusable vaginal speculums. The results showed that in some aspects, the reusable stainless-steel speculum outperformed the disposable acrylic speculum, but not in all categories. Therefore, the choice of which speculum to use should be based on specific environmental objectives.

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS (2022)

Article Environmental Sciences

A Transparency Checklist for Carbon Footprint Calculations Applied within a Systematic Review of Virtual Care Interventions

Oliver Lange et al.

Summary: This study aims to develop a transparency catalogue to assess the carbon footprint of virtual care interventions. The transparency score is low and there is limited evidence on the impact of virtual care on reducing healthcare carbon footprint.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH (2022)

Review Green & Sustainable Science & Technology

Assessment of the environmental impacts of medical devices: a review

Ana Catarina Sousa et al.

Summary: The medical device industry is facing increasing pressure to assess the environmental impacts of their products and make more sustainable decisions. While studies on life cycle assessment and eco-design in the MDs industry are limited, they show potential to improve the environmental sustainability of medical devices.

ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY (2021)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

Environmental impact of personal protective equipment distributed for use by health and social care services in England in the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic

Chantelle Rizan et al.

Summary: The study quantified the environmental impact of PPE distributed in England during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a focus on carbon footprint, damage to human health, impact on ecosystems, and resource depletion. The results showed that strategies such as domestic manufacture, rational glove use, reusable equipment, and waste management optimization could significantly reduce the environmental impact of PPE by up to 75% compared to the base scenario, resulting in savings of DALYs, species loss, and resource costs.

JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF MEDICINE (2021)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews

Matthew J. Page et al.

Summary: The PRISMA statement was designed to help systematic reviewers transparently report the purpose, methods, and findings of their reviews. The updated PRISMA 2020 statement includes new reporting guidance, a 27-item checklist, an abstract checklist, and revised flow diagrams for reviews.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2021)

Article Green & Sustainable Science & Technology

Engineering Design Process of Face Masks Based on Circularity and Life Cycle Assessment in the Constraint of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Nuria Boix Rodriguez et al.

Summary: Face masks are essential equipment to combat COVID-19, but their extensive use has resulted in significant plastic waste. Environmental assessments show that reusable masks are the most sustainable option, offering guidance for designing eco-friendly masks to minimize environmental impact.

SUSTAINABILITY (2021)

Review Environmental Sciences

Operating in a Climate Crisis: A State-of-the-Science Review of Life Cycle Assessment within Surgical and Anesthetic Care

Jonathan Drew et al.

Summary: This analysis reviewed the environmental impacts of surgical and anesthetic care, finding that healthcare provision is a significant driver of environmental pollution, especially in terms of climate impact. Studies on life cycle assessments in this field are limited, with methodological heterogeneity and lack of data being key limitations. The research provides insights into the environmental impacts associated with surgical and anesthetic care, highlighting the need for more comprehensive studies in this area.

ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES (2021)

Article Engineering, Environmental

Life cycle assessment of single-use surgical and embedded filtration layer (EFL) reusable face mask

Amos Wei Lun Lee et al.

Summary: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a surge in global face mask consumption, with reusable EFL masks showing lower environmental impact compared to single-use surgical masks, emitting less CO2 and generating less waste.

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING (2021)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

A life cycle assessment of reprocessing face masks during the Covid-19 pandemic

Bart van Straten et al.

Summary: The Covid-19 pandemic caused shortages in medical products, with a study showing that reprocessing face masks can reduce carbon footprint and costs. It is important for policymakers to consider circular economy strategies for reducing the carbon footprint of medical products.

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2021)

Review Health Policy & Services

Life cycle assessment as decision support tool for environmental management in hospitals: A literature review

Christin Seifert et al.

Summary: Life cycle assessment (LCA) is an environmental accounting tool used to evaluate the environmental impacts of products, processes, or organizational activities. Studies have shown that various LCA approaches are used in hospitals to compare different environmental impacts and hotspots. The results indicate that LCA can provide environmental information to help managers make decisions that align with environmental goals.

HEALTH CARE MANAGEMENT REVIEW (2021)

Article Obstetrics & Gynecology

A comparative carbon footprint analysis of disposable and reusable vaginal specula

Laura M. Donahue et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2020)

Review Engineering, Environmental

Quantifying hospital services by carbon footprint: A systematic literature review of patient care alternatives

Fadhel Alshqaqeeq et al.

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING (2020)

Article Engineering, Environmental

Environmental and economic comparison of reusable and disposable blood pressure cuffs in multiple clinical settings

Sarah A. Sanchez et al.

RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING (2020)

Review Surgery

The Carbon Footprint of Surgical Operations A Systematic Review

Chantelle Rizan et al.

ANNALS OF SURGERY (2020)

Article Environmental Sciences

International comparison of health care carbon footprints

Peter-Paul Pichler et al.

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS (2019)

Article Medicine, Research & Experimental

A Budget Impact Model to Estimate the Environmental Impact of Adopting RESPIMAT Re-usable in the Nordics and Benelux

Gustaf Ortsater et al.

ADVANCES IN THERAPY (2019)

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Environmental considerations in the selection of isolation gowns: A life cycle assessment of reusable and disposable alternatives

Eric Vozzola et al.

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL (2018)

Article Anesthesiology

Financial and environmental costs of reusable and single-use anaesthetic equipment

F. McGain et al.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA (2017)

Article Engineering, Environmental

Comparative life cycle assessment of reused versus disposable dental burs

Scott R. Unger et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (2014)

Article Engineering, Environmental

Eco-efficiency of disposable and reusable surgical instruments-a scissors case

Suphunnika Ibbotson et al.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT (2013)

Article Anesthesiology

A Life Cycle Assessment of Reusable and Single-Use Central Venous Catheter Insertion Kits

Forbes McGain et al.

ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA (2012)

Article Anesthesiology

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Disposable and Reusable Laryngeal Mask Airways

Matthew Eckelman et al.

ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA (2012)

Article Anesthesiology

The financial and environmental costs of reusable and single-use plastic anaesthetic drug trays

F. McGain et al.

ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE (2010)