4.6 Review

Advancements, challenges and future perspectives on peptide-based drugs: Focus on antimicrobial peptides

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2022.106363

Keywords

Peptide drugs; Antimicrobial peptides; Antibiotics; Drug resistance; Oral delivery; Bioavailability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review explores the historical background, research trends, technological advancements, challenges, and future perspectives in the development and applications of antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) as potential therapeutic molecules. Vital questions regarding pharmaceutical production, the slow and steady journey, the importance of oral bioavailability, and the drug resistance possibilities of AMPs were raised and addressed. Therefore, this study is believed to provide a profound understanding of the past, current, and future scenarios on the therapeutic impacts of peptide drugs.
Among other health related issues, the rising concerns on drug resistance led to look for alternative pharmaceutical drugs that are effective both against infectious and noninfectious diseases. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) emerged as potential therapeutic molecule with wide range of applications. With their limitations, AMPs have gained reputable attentions in research as well as in the pharmaceutical industry. This review highlighted the historical background, research trends, technological advancements, challenges, and future perspectives in the development and applications of peptide drugs. Some vital questions related with the need for pharmaceutical production, factors for the slow and steady journey, the importance of oral bioavailability, and the drug resistance possibilities of AMPs were raised and addressed accordingly. Therefore, the current study is believed to provide a profound understanding in the past and current scenarios and future directions on the therapeutic impacts of peptide drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available