4.7 Article

Molecular tumour board at European Institute of Oncology: Report of the first three year activity of an Italian precision oncology experience

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 183, Issue -, Pages 79-89

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.01.019

Keywords

Precision oncology; Molecular tumour board; Targeted therapy; Biomarker; Real world data; Actionability

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Precision oncology aims to improve clinical outcomes by personalizing treatment options for cancer patients. Utilizing ESCAT allows evidence-based evaluation of genomic findings for treatment selection. Molecular tumor boards provide the multidisciplinary expertise necessary for ESCAT evaluation and strategic treatment choice.
Background: Precision oncology aims to improve clinical outcomes by personalis-ing treatment options for patients with cancer. Exploiting vulnerabilities identified in a pa-tient's cancer genome requires reliable interpretation of a huge mole of alterations and heterogeneous biomarkers. ESMO Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ES -CAT) allows evidence-based evaluation of genomic findings. Molecular tumour boards (MTBs) convey the required multi-disciplinary expertise to enable ESCAT evaluation and strategical treatment choice.Materials and method: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 251 consecutive patients dis-cussed by European Institute of Oncology MTB between June 2019 and June 2022.Results: One-hundred eighty-eight (74.6%) patients had at least one actionable alteration. Af-ter MTB discussion, 76 patients received molecularly matched therapies (MMTs) while 76 pa-tients received standard of care. Patients receiving MMT displayed higher overall response rate (37.3% versus 12.9%), median progression-free survival (mPFS 5.8 months, 95% confi-dence interval [CI] 4.1-7.5 versus 3.6 months, 95% CI 2.5-4.8, p Z 0.041; hazard ratio 0.679, 95% CI 0.467-0. 987) and median overall survival (mOS 35.1 months, 95% CI not evaluable versus 8.5 months, 95% CI 3.8-13.2; hazard ratio 0.431, 95% CI 0.250-0.744, p = 0.002). Superiority in OS and PFS persisted in multivariable models. Among 61 pre-treated patients receiving MMT, 37.5% of patients had PFS2/PFS1 ratio >1.3. Patients with higher actionable targets (ESCAT tier I) had better OS (p = 0.001) and PFS (p = 0.049), while no difference was observed in lower evidence levels.Conclusions: Our experience shows that MTBs can yield valuable clinical benefit. Higher ac-tionability ESCAT level appears to be associated with better outcomes for patients receiving MMT. 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available