4.2 Article

Pregnancy outcome of gestational diabetes mellitus using a structured model of care : WINGS project (WINGS-10)

Journal

JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 468-475

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jog.13249

Keywords

Asian Indian; gestational diabetes mellitus; International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups; maternal and fetal outcome; model of care; South Asian

Funding

  1. Seethapathy Clinic and Hospital
  2. Dr Mohan's Diabetes Specialties Center
  3. Anuradha Maternity Center
  4. Andhra Mahila Sabha Hospital
  5. Punjab Association Clinic
  6. Prashanth Hospital
  7. WINGS project [WINGS-10]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimTo evaluate the impact of a structured model of care (MOC) prepared for resource-constrained settings, on the pregnancy outcomes of Asian Indian women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). MethodsPregnant women were screened under the Women in India with GDM Strategy (WINGS) MOC for GDM using the International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups criteria. Women with GDM went through a structured MOC that included medical nutrition therapy (MNT), regular physical activity (PA); and insulin when indicated. Fasting blood glucose and post-prandial blood sugar were monitored every 2 weeks. The pregnancy outcomes of women with GDM who underwent the MOC were compared with those without GDM. ResultsUnder the MOC, 212 women with GDM were followed through pregnancy, of whom 33 (15.6%) required insulin and 179 (84.4%) were managed with MNT and PA. The maternal and neonatal outcomes of women with GDM were similar to the non-GDM women: there were no significant differences in pregnancy complications such as cesarean section, macrosomia, pre-eclampsia, oligo/polyhydramnios, preterm delivery, neonatal death, fetal distress, hyperbilirubinemia and low birthweight. ConclusionImplementation of a structured MOC for women with GDM helped achieve pregnancy outcomes similar to those without GDM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available