4.2 Article

Oral contraceptive therapy reduces serum relaxin-2 in elite female athletes

Journal

JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH
Volume 43, Issue 3, Pages 530-535

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jog.13226

Keywords

anterior cruciate ligament (ACL); luteal phase; menstrual cycle; oral contraceptive (OC); relaxin-2

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimRecent investigations have demonstrated that athletes with high relaxin-2 levels have a high risk of anterior cruciate ligament injuries, while athletes taking oral contraceptives (OC) have low relaxin-2 levels. It has not yet been clarified whether taking OC reduces relaxin-2 levels. The purpose of this study was to investigate changes in relaxin-2 levels in athletes taking OC. MethodsLevels of relaxin-2, estradiol, progesterone, luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone were measured in serum samples (n = 183) from 106 elite female athletes. Five athletes with serum relaxin-2 concentrations > 6 pg/mL during the luteal phase were recruited to assess the effect of OC therapy. ResultsSerum relaxin-2 concentrations were significantly higher during the luteal phase (n = 57) than in the follicular phase (n = 72), or in athletes on OC therapy (n = 10) (P < 0.001, P < 0.001 and P < 0.05, respectively). In the luteal phase, 36.8% (21/57) of the athletes had relaxin levels > 6 pg/mL. In 23 athletes, serum relaxin-2 concentrations were measured during both the follicular and luteal phases, revealing that relaxin-2 levels were significantly higher in the luteal phase compared with the follicular phase. In 5 out of 23 athletes, serum relaxin-2 concentrations were > 6 pg/mL in the luteal phase and during the second cycle of OC therapy, relaxin-2 concentrations decreased dramatically to below the detection limit (0.26 pg/mL). ConclusionsHigh serum relaxin-2 concentrations were only detected during the luteal phase. In athletes with high relaxin-2 concentrations during the luteal phase, OC therapy decreased serum relaxin-2 levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available