4.8 Article

Comparison of Phase States of PM2.5 over Megacities, Seoul and Beijing, and Their Implications on Particle Size Distribution

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 24, Pages 17581-17590

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c06377

Keywords

phase state; morphology; PM2; 5; aerosol liquid water content; size distribution; megacities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the phase state of fine mode aerosols (PM2.5) in Seoul and Beijing by collecting filter samples and using optical microscopy. The results show differences in the phase states of PM2.5 between the two cities, which are related to the chemical compositions of the aerosols and ambient relative humidity.
Although the particle phase state is an important property, there is scant information on it, especially, for real-world aerosols. To explore the phase state of fine mode aerosols (PM2.5) in two megacities, Seoul and Beijing, we collected PM2.5 filter samples daily from Dec 2020 to Jan 2021. Using optical microscopy combined with the poke-and-flow technique, the phase states of the bulk of PM2.5 as a function of relative humidity (RH) were determined and compared to the ambient RH ranges in the two cities. PM2.5 was found to be liquid to semisolid in Seoul but mostly semisolid to solid in Beijing. The liquid state was dominant on polluted days, while a semisolid state was dominant on clean days in Seoul. These findings can be explained by the aerosol liquid water content related to the chemical compositions of the aerosols at ambient RH; the water content of PM2.5 was much higher in Seoul than in Beijing. Furthermore, the overall phase states of PM2.5 observed in Seoul and Beijing were interrelated with the particle size distribution. The results of this study aid in a better understanding of the fundamental physical properties of aerosols and in examining how these are linked to PM2.5 in polluted urban atmospheres.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available