4.8 Article

Paints: A Source of Volatile PFAS in Air?Potential Implications for Inhalation Exposure

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c04864

Keywords

paint; FTOH; diPAP; total fluorine; NMR; LC-qTOF; TD-GC; MS; inhalation

Funding

  1. Oregon State University Provost Scholarship
  2. Oregon State University NMR Facility - National Institutes of Health, HEI Grant [1S10OD018518]
  3. M. J. Murdock Charitable Trust [2014162]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzed the presence of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in indoor paints and found that 6:2 fluorotelomer alcohol and 6:2 fluorotelomer phosphate ester were the main components. The evaluation of paints indicated a potential risk of human exposure during the painting process.
Paints are widely used in indoor settings yet there are no data for volatile per-and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) for paints or knowledge if paints are potentially important sources of human exposure to PFAS. Different commercial paints (n = 27) were collected from local hardware stores and analyzed for volatile PFAS by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), nonvolatile PFAS by liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (LC-qTOF), and total fluorine by 19F nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR). Diluted paint required clean up to remove 6:2 fluorotelomer phosphate diester (diPAP), which thermally transforms into 6:2 FTOH at 280 degrees C (GC inlet temperature). Only 6:2 FTOH (0.9-83 mu g/g) and 6:2 diPAP (0.073-58 mu g/g) were found in five exterior and nine interior paints and only accounted for a maximum of 17% of total fluorine. Upon drying, 40% of the FTOH mass was lost, and the loss was verified by measurements of the cumulative FTOH mass measured in the air of a small, confined space over a 3 h period. Based on the liquid paint results, the ConsExpo model was used for potential exposure assessment and one commercial paint exceeded the chosen reference dose (5 mu g/kg-day) for children and adults, indicating the potential for human exposure during painting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available