4.8 Article

Techno-economic Analysis of Sustainable Biofuels for Marine Transportation

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 56, Issue 23, Pages 17206-17214

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.2c03960

Keywords

heavy fuel oil; marine biofuels; decarbonization; techno-economic analysis; sustainability

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Bioenergy Technologies Office (BETO) [DE-AC05-76RL01830, DE-AC36-08GO28308]
  2. DOE BETO [PO-2196073]
  3. Contra Costa Central Sanitary District (CCCSD)
  4. Waste Management and Engineered BioSlurry
  5. Ghost Warrior and Courage Inn Restaurants of the Lewis-McCord United States Air Force Base

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a comparative analysis of four conversion pathways for renewable biofuels in marine transportation. The study found that biofuels could be a cost-effective and sustainable fuel option for the marine sector. Strategies to reduce sulfur content in biofuels were also discussed.
Renewable, low-carbon biofuels offer the potential opportunity to decarbonize marine transportation. This paper presents a comparative techno-economic analysis and process sustainability assessment of four conversion pathways: (1) hydro-thermal liquefaction (HTL) of wet wastes such as sewage sludge and manure; (2) fast pyrolysis of woody biomass; (3) landfill gas Fischer-Tropsch synthesis; and (4) lignin-ethanol oil from the lignocellulosic ethanol biorefinery utilizing reductive catalytic fractionation. These alternative marine biofuels have a modeled minimum fuel selling price between $1.68 and $3.98 per heavy fuel oil gallon equivalent in 2016 U.S. dollars based on a mature plant assessment. The selected pathways also exhibit good process sustainability performance in terms of water intensity compared to the petroleum refineries. Further, the O and S contents of the biofuels vary widely. While the non-HTL biofuels exhibit negligible S content, the raw biocrudes via HTL pathways from sludge and manure show relatively high S contents (>0.5 wt %). Partial or full hydrotreatment can effectively lower the biocrude S content. Additionally, co-feeding with other low-sulfur wet wastes such as food waste can provide another option to produce raw biocrude with lower S content to meet the target with further hydrotreatment. This study indicates that biofuels could be a cost-effective fuel option for the marine sector. Marine biofuels derived from various feedstocks and conversion technologies could mitigate marine biofuel adoption risk in terms of feedstock availability and biorefinery economics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available