4.7 Article

Livestock removal increases plant cover across a heterogeneous dryland landscape on the Colorado Plateau

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/acb728

Keywords

grazing; cattle; remote sensing; synthetic control; ecological site; land management; counterfactual analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Livestock removal is an effective strategy to increase plant cover and reduce bare soil on the Colorado Plateau, although warming temperatures may suppress these rates. Soil played a complex role in mediating land cover changes over time. Including soil information in decision-making can improve efficiency.
Livestock removal is increasingly used as a management option to mitigate the negative impacts of grazing-related disturbances on rangelands. Removal generally increases plant cover, but it is unclear when, where, and by how much plant and soil cover changes can be expected. On the Colorado Plateau, complex geology, topography, soils, and climate all interact to mediate the relationship between land cover, climate, and disturbance. In this study we used new developments in land cover mapping and analysis to assess landscape plant and bare soil cover up to 30 years after livestock removal from two grazing allotments in Capitol Reef National Park, Utah, USA. Results indicate that livestock removal increases plant cover 0.17%-0.32% per year and reduces bare soil cover 0.34%-0.41% per year, although these rates may be suppressed by warming temperatures. Soils, assessed through soil geomorphic units, played a strong but complex role in mediating land cover changes through time. These results suggest that livestock removal is an effective strategy for increasing plant cover and reducing bare soil on the Colorado Plateau, but including soil information in decision making will enhance efficiency by improving manager's ability to prioritize

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available