Journal
CATALYSIS TODAY
Volume 257, Issue -, Pages 122-130Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2015.02.010
Keywords
Magnesia; Niobic acid; Niobia; Ruthenium; Methane; Steam reforming
Funding
- Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research, Rome (MIUR, Progetti di Ricerca Scientifica di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale) [2010XFT2BB]
- Higher Education Commission of Pakistan
Ask authors/readers for more resources
A comparative analysis of Ru catalysts for low temperature (400-750 degrees C) methane steam reforming reaction has been performed on magnesia, niobic acid and niobia supports. Ru from chloride or nitrosyl nitrate precursors was deposited by incipient wetness impregnation method on supports calcined in different ways. All of the MgO-supported catalysts were calcined at 400 degrees C whilst the niobia-based catalysts underwent different calcinations regimes. The catalytic activity towards the methane steam reforming reaction was assessed in a fixed bed quartz reactor with an overall flow rate of 100 N cm(3) min(-1) (weight space velocity WSV of 33 N cm(3) min(-1) gc-al] and steam-to-carbon SIC ratio equal to 4). All of the catalysts showed comparable results, especially the magnesia- and the niobic acid-supported catalysts resulted in high activity at 700 degrees C, whereas a few of the niobia-supported catalysts achieved complete CH4 conversion. The best performing catalysts were characterized by BET, CO chemisorption, XRD, XPS and SEM analyses. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available