Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.The 28+28 day design is an effective sampling time for analyzing mutant frequencies in rapidly proliferating tissues of MutaMouse animals
Francesco Marchetti et al.
ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY (2021)
Permitted daily exposure limits for noteworthy N-nitrosamines
George E. Johnson et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS (2021)
Mutation as a Toxicological Endpoint for Regulatory Decision-Making
Robert H. Heflich et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS (2020)
Quantitative Interpretation of Genetic Toxicity Dose-Response Data for Risk Assessment and Regulatory Decision-Making: Current Status and Emerging Priorities
Paul A. White et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS (2020)
Consensus Modeling of Median Chemical Intake for the US Population Based on Predictions of Exposure Pathways
Caroline L. Ring et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY (2019)
A general theory of effect size, and its consequences for defining the benchmark response (BMR) for continuous endpoints
Wout Slob
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY (2017)
Comparing BMD-Derived Genotoxic Potency Estimations Across Variants of the Transgenic Rodent Gene Mutation Assay
John W. Wills et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS (2017)
An appraisal of critical effect sizes for the benchmark dose approach to assess dose-response relationships in genetic toxicology
Andreas Zeller et al.
ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY (2017)
Clarification of some aspects related to genotoxicity assessment
Anthony Hardy et al.
EFSA JOURNAL (2017)
Illustrative case using the RISK21 roadmap and matrix: prioritization for evaluation of chemicals found in drinking water
Douglas C. Wolf et al.
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY (2016)
Estimating the carcinogenic potency of chemicals from the in vivo micronucleus test
Lya G. Soeteman-Hernandez et al.
MUTAGENESIS (2016)
The use of dose-response data in a margin of exposure approach to carcinogenic risk assessment for genotoxic chemicals in food
Diane J. Benford
MUTAGENESIS (2016)
Derivation of Point of Departure (PoD) Estimates in Genetic Toxicology Studies and Their Potential Applications in Risk Assessment
G. E. Johnson et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS (2014)
High Throughput Heuristics for Prioritizing Human Exposure to Environmental Chemicals
John F. Wambaugh et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY (2014)
Can Carcinogenic Potency be Predicted From In Vivo Genotoxicity Data? A Meta-Analysis of Historical Data
Lya G. Hernandez et al.
ENVIRONMENTAL AND MOLECULAR MUTAGENESIS (2011)
Drug substances presented as sulfonic acid salts: overview of utility, safety and regulation
David P. Elder et al.
JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND PHARMACOLOGY (2010)
Considerations regarding a permitted daily exposure calculation for ethyl methanesulfonate
Lutz Mueller et al.
TOXICOLOGY LETTERS (2009)
Risk assessment of substances that are both genotoxic and carcinogenic -: Report of an International Conference organized by EFSA and WHO with support of ILSI Europe
S. Barlow et al.
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY (2006)
Presence of therapeutic drugs in the environment
E Zuccato et al.
LANCET (2000)
Share Paper
