4.5 Article

Design of compliant constant-output-force mechanisms using topology optimization

Journal

ENGINEERING OPTIMIZATION
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/0305215X.2022.2139373

Keywords

Topology optimization; compliant mechanism; constant force mechanism; minimum length scale; bifurcation

Funding

  1. Guangzhou Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation
  2. Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University
  3. Research Fund of the Guangdong Key Laboratory of Precision Equipment and Manufacturing Technique
  4. [99/991620450]
  5. [1745801]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a topology optimization method for designing hinge-free compliant constant-output-force mechanisms. By introducing a constraint for preventing bifurcation and utilizing a minimum scale constraint method, the optimization design and fabrication of the optimized CCFM are achieved and tested. The optimized CCFM exhibits a small force variation over the constant-force stroke, showing competitiveness.
Compliant constant-force mechanisms (CCFMs) are compliant mechanisms that provide nearly constant forces over prescribed deflection ranges. This study proposes a topology optimization method for designing hinge-free compliant constant-output-force mechanisms. Bifurcation cause the objective function to oscillate, leading to convergence failure. Therefore, a constraint for preventing bifurcation in constant-output-force mechanisms is proposed. Moreover, a minimum scale constraint method that extends the design domain is utilized in the proposed optimization algorithm. The relationship between the minimum length scale and the force variation in the optimized CCFM is obtained and discussed, and an optimized CCFM is fabricated and tested. The optimized CCFM exhibits a force variation of 0.7% over a constant-force stroke of 26% of the CCFM length and is thus competitive among recently proposed CCFMs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available