4.7 Article

Constructing practices of engagement with users and communities: Comparing emergent state-led smart local energy systems

Journal

ENERGY POLICY
Volume 171, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113279

Keywords

Engagement; Participation; Energy transitions; Decentralisation; Policy; Public

Funding

  1. Energy Revolution Research Consortium (EnergyRev) as part of the Prospering From the Energy Revolution (PFER) [EP/S031863/1]
  2. Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) [16/SP/3804, 13/RC/2077]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Engagement with users, local communities, and wider publics is crucial for successful and fair energy transitions. This study focuses on the development of decentralised energy systems initiated by the central government, specifically Smart Local Energy Systems (SLES). The research findings reveal diverse methods and rationales of engagement employed by project partners, independent of project size. The study emphasizes the need for future SLES policies to prioritize engagement, facilitate social learning between projects, and expand public engagement beyond individual project boundaries.
Energy transitions require engagement with users, local communities and wider publics in order to be fair, acceptable and, ultimately, successful. Here we focus on the development of decentralised energy systems instigated by central government. Smart Local Energy Systems (SLES), involving low carbon generation, demand sources and smart technologies in a geographically-bounded location, are important but unexplored contexts for public engagement. Drawing on 23 interviews with partner organisations in 12 UK SLES projects, we investigate the targets, methods and rationales of engagement. Partners engage a range of user and community groups around multiple energy system components using a variety of methods, directly and via intermediary organi-sations. Project size is not a major influence on breadth and intensity of engagement. Project partners rationalise practices with reference to characterisations of users and engagement, and practices are conditioned by a range of factors (e.g. technological boundaries, place, partners involved, and the wider organisational context within which SLES projects take place). We highlight a need for future SLES policy to emphasise engagement as a key facet, institute systematic social learning between SLES projects, and consider how to engage publics beyond the boundaries of individual projects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available