4.7 Article

Mid-term energy consumption predicting model for natural gas pipeline considering the effects of operating strategy

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 274, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2022.116429

Keywords

Natural gas pipeline; Energy consumption prediction; Compressor station; Operating strategy

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Department of Ningxia
  2. Chinese-German Center for Research Promotion
  3. [2022ZDYF1483]
  4. [GZ1577]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes an energy consumption prediction model based on operating strategy and compressor station working mechanism. By determining appropriate operating scheme using historical data, the model accurately predicts future energy consumption.
Natural gas transmission with pipeline takes a large part of energy consumption in the natural gas industry, whose energy consumption prediction plays a vital role in its planning and management. Currently used energy consumption prediction methods are usually based merely on energy consumption data and experience. How-ever, lacking the support of mechanism, especially the operating scheme, these plausible methods can yield large error if the gas transmission plan varies drastically. Towards this concern, this work proposed an energy con-sumption predicting model based on the operating strategy and the subsequent working mechanism of compressor stations. Strategies to ascertain appropriate operating scheme for prediction were proposed based on historical working data. With proper training, the model can render future annual energy consumption accu-rately, with monthly gas transmission plan as the sole input. Considering the different operating strategies and working status, validations and analyses were presented based on the proposed model, which revealed the influential factors for the energy consumption predicting.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available