4.7 Review

Review on Pore-Scale Physics of Shale Gas Recovery Dynamics: Insights from Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Journal

ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 36, Issue 24, Pages 14657-14672

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.2c03388

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF)
  2. [CBET-1705287]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper reviews the use of molecular dynamics simulations to study shale gas recovery at the nanoscale. The design and simulation protocols of the systems used to study gas recovery are discussed, followed by a review of gas recovery in scenarios involving single-component gas, multicomponent gas, and multiphase flows. Emphasis is placed on works exploring and elucidating new pore-scale phenomena, as well as guiding and validating new pore-scale continuum models.
Reliable prediction of gas recovery from shale formations is essential for achieving the full potential of shale gas. A distinguishing feature of shales is that nanoscale pores dominate their porosity. Hence, confinement and fluid-wall interactions modulate shale gas storage, transport, and recovery, which are neglected in conventional gas recovery models. Because these nanoscale effects can be simulated using molecular dynamics (MD), related works have proliferated. Here, we review MD modeling of shale gas recovery at the pore scale. The design and simulation protocols of MD systems for studying gas recovery are surveyed first. Then, the gas recovery in three scenarios, i.e., recovery of single-component gas, recovery of multicomponent gas, and gas recovery involving multiphase flows, are reviewed. In particular, works exploring and elucidating new pore-scale phenomena and guiding and validating new pore-scale continuum models are highlighted. Finally, we recommend best practices in MD shale gas studies and suggest several research directions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available