4.7 Article

A novel air flowrate control method based on terminal damper opening prediction in multi-zone VAV system

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 263, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126031

Keywords

VAV; Flowrate control; Damper opening prediction; Duct network impedance model

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a novel damper opening prediction algorithm and a flow rate control method based on demand air flow rate, which are both verified through case simulation. The prediction algorithm is based on a duct network impedance model, with a maximum prediction error of less than 1 degree. The flow rate control method does not require static pressure measurement and can reduce airflow fluctuation time by 55% and fan power consumption by 21.6% compared to the constant static pressure setting method.
Damper opening prediction under demand flowrate is the key for the novel feed-forward control method of damper opening and fan frequency, which is widely applied in the VAV system as well as many other processes. This paper proposed a novel damper opening prediction algorithm under demand air flowrate, and a novel air flowrate control method based on this prediction algorithm, which are both verified by the case simulation. The novel prediction algorithm is based on duct network impedance model, and the maximum opening prediction error can be less than & PLUSMN;1 degrees by 5 groups sample identification. The novel flowrate control method does not need static pressure measurement, and can reduce airflow fluctuation time by 55% and fan power consumption by 21.6% compared with constant static pressure setting method, which is potential to replace the static pressure setting method in VAV air conditioning system. The work of this paper provides the basic algorithm and control method for energy saving control of the duct or pipe network in HVAC system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available